STATE FARM'S HEAD ON A PLATTER
What Gulf Coast Congressman Gene Taylor wanted the Easter Bunny to bring him.
South Mississippi Living 4/07

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Windstorm rates: From bad to worse





OUR OPINION: NATIONAL HELP NEEDED FOR INSURANCE CRISIS

Here we are in the middle of the hurricane season, 15 years after Andrew, and still the windstorm-insurance market keeps going from bad to worse. Despite legislative efforts to provide rate relief earlier this year, most insurance companies have increased rather than decreased their premiums. State Farm, Florida's largest private-insurance company, plans to drop 50,000 coastal policies next year. A few days ago, Nationwide Insurance of Florida said it will not renew 39,000 property policies starting in January.

The problem is not limited to Florida, either. A survey reported in The Wall Street Journal said more than three million Americans were dropped by their home insurers in the last two years, most of them in the 16 Southeastern states. More and more homeowners who don't have a mortgage are ''going bare'' -- i.e., going without windstorm insurance -- because premiums are too high, the newspaper reported.

The recent second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina was a reminder of yet another aspect of how the market isn't working: Insurers and homeowners are engaged in a big legal fight over whether damage was caused by wind or water. Private insurers are insisting that flood insurance, which usually means the federal government, should pay for recovery.

Bottom line: The market is dysfunctional.

The creation of Citizens Property Insurance as the state-backed insurer of last resort was a reaction to the market's collapse in this state. Today, it should be obvious that the problem is bigger than Florida. It is time for the federal government to act accordingly.

The latest idea making the rounds on Capitol Hill would add the peril of windstorm insurance to the federal flood-insurance program. Sponsored by U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., the plan has been added to a flood-insurance reform bill (HR 3121) that has already been approved by the Financial Services Committee and has the backing of Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the House leadership.

This plan is far from ideal. The flood-insurance program has been dogged by a series of problems over the years and currently is $17.5 billion in debt. Yet the proposal merits serious consideration because the federal government has a necessary role in this type of coverage.

One advantage would be the mandate to establish federal standards -- read building codes -- that would be used to determine rates for individual properties once local governments opt into the federal program. Without such a mandate, vast stretches of populated areas vulnerable to windstorm peril will never have acceptable standards.

Critics will say this puts the burden on taxpayers who don't live in imperiled areas. However, they already are on the hook. Look no further than Hurricane Katrina: Thus far, the federal tab is $114 billion. Lacking a federally backed plan like the flood program, however, the national government throws money at the damaged area and spends it in wasteful and inefficient ways -- without being able to rely on a cash pool created by homeowner premiums.

This issue is a priority for everyone in Florida who pays property insurance. We hope the Democratic presidential candidates in town for tonight's debate -- particularly those in Congress -- are asked whether they support this or a similar national plan.

It should be evident by now that the insurance industry can't do the job by itself. Yet it has an important role to play in helping lawmakers find consensus on the proper role for government, instead of issuing shopworn warnings about the evils of government intrusion. Like it or not, the federal government will have to undertake the burden that private industry plainly can no longer bear.

The Miami Herald originally published this editorial on September 9, 2007.

Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Group supports multi-peril option



NAHB says business is bad

By MICHAEL NEWSOM
mmnewsom@sunherald.com
Posted on Sun, Sep. 09, 2007


The multi-peril insurance proposal before Congress gained a powerful endorsement on Saturday, from the 235,000-member National Association of Homebuilders at the group's national convention in Seattle.

Gulfport builder John Ruble, who sits on both the state and national chapters' executive boards, said the group that calls itself the "voice of America's housing industry" needs a multi-peril option as part of the National Flood Insurance Program to stimulate their business.

Ruble was credited with helping get the resolution passed by the group Saturday night.

Ruble said times are hard for a large number of homebuilders, especially those in coastal states, and the plan would obviously help South Mississippi.

"Our business is flat dead because our people can't afford insurance," Ruble said.

The plan, which helps those who live in high-risk areas for natural disasters, for South Mississippians' purposes expands the government's flood insurance to also cover wind damage. Many private insurance groups won't write policies on the Coast, and many aren't rebuilding their homes because of that.

He said among the group's member states are several that, like Mississippi, rely on "wind-pool insurance" which is a government-supported wind insurance of last resort for those who live in areas where private insurers have stopped writing wind coverage.

The NAHB resolution asked that the multi-perils guidelines not increase construction requirements beyond what is stipulated in state and local building codes, because stronger requirements might increase costs to homeowners who are already struggling to afford housing. The group contends current building codes, many that were passed after Katrina, offer enough protection.

Ruble said NAHB's Washington lobbyists will take their multi-peril plan suggestions to Congress to drum up support. The multi-peril plan is part of the proposed the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2007 known as House Resolution 3121.

U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor of Bay St. Louis, who has championed the plan, said it was a key endorsement and he credited the state's chapters for taking the message to Seattle.

"This is great news," Taylor said. "The endorsement of the homebuilders will add to the momentum for the multiple peril insurance bill. The homebuilders recognize that the collapse of the private insurance market in coastal communities is a national crisis. I am grateful to John Ruble, Bobby Rayburn and other Mississippi homebuilders for getting this resolution on the national association's agenda."

The Sun Herald published the original story on September 9, 2007.

Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Like Rocky, we must never lose sight of the goal



EDITORIAL

It could be a scene from a movie: "Rocky - The Katrina Sequel." The chants from the seemingly forgotten areas of Hancock County seem so faint, "Rocky! Rocky!" Then a little louder and a little clearer, "Go, Rocky, Go!"

But there is a sad sense of desperation in the chant, a sense of desperation which we pray continues to resonate across America in a way that leads to solutions to the many challenges we still face.

Unfortunately, this isn't a movie.

As the Sun Herald reported last week, President Bush may have gotten more than he bargained for when he asked Rocky Pullman how things are going.

Pullman, president of the Hancock County Board of Supervisors, gave a candid, frustrated answer born from two years of struggling to help his county recover from Hurricane Katrina. In so many words, he said: Things are not going well and the feds just don't get it. He later added, "We have been driving home that Hancock County was ground zero in the hurricane. Now, we're ground zero in restoration."

Bush was here on a post-hurricane tour, his 15th visit since Katrina. On previous visits, he has taken the time to sit down with private- and public-sector leaders to get as clear an understanding of the current situation as possible. He takes notes and asks questions.

On this visit, U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, Sen. Trent Lott, Gov. Haley Barbour, Waveland Mayor Tommy Longo and Bay St. Louis Mayor Eddie Favre and others shared thoughts about the state of the recovery and rebuilding effort.

You've heard it a thousand times by now: Nothing could have prepared all levels of government for the brutal reality of Hurricane Katrina. In many ways, as difficult and challenging as the cleanup has been (up to 50 million cubic yards of debris picked up in Mississippi alone, compared to 25 million cubic yards after Hurricane Andrew), the recovery and rebuilding effort in the aftermath of the worst natural disaster in American history has been even more challenging. We are working every day in South Mississippi to find solutions to problems that have never been faced before.

And we hope that Rocky Pullman's passion, frustration and knowledge of the challenges, combined with the input from the others sitting around the table, will keep all levels of government engaged in South Mississippi for the long haul.

For the too many seemingly invisible residents in Hancock County, and across the coast of South Mississippi, it was critical for Rocky to lay it on the line: "This is bigger than local elected officials can overcome." He reeled off a list of worries that included a sluggish recovery, acres of dead trees, crumbling roads, decimated houses, no county jail, a lack of adequate FEMA representation in the county, and homeowner grants that seem to arrive too late or not at all. He asked for more help: at least eight more months of federal assistance, $10 million to $12 million in additional funding, help from the U.S. Forest Service to deal with major tree problems, quicker delivery on stalled federal homeowners' relief grants, and a full-time FEMA team assigned to the county for the duration.

That's quite a list to respond to, but it is accurate and concise. There is no knock-out punch in achieving recovery; every round - every different aspect affecting people, housing, business, local government, infrastructure, insurance, environment - must be won for recovery to be a success. We cannot lose sight of the goal.

We know that the many people laboring toward recovery continue to chant, "Go, Rocky, Go!"

If only this were a "Rocky" movie...

The editorial above represents the views of the Sun Herald editorial board: President-Publisher Ricky R. Mathews, Vice President and Executive Editor Stan Tiner, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Flora S. Point, Opinion Page Editor Marie Harris and Associate Editor Tony Biffle. Opinions expressed by columnists, cartoonists and letter writers on these pages are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board.

The Sun Herald published the original story on September 9, 2007.


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Saturday, September 08, 2007

The Best of A.M. in the Morning! Sept 2 - 7, 2007

by Ana Maria

Be sure to read my rebuttal to an anonymous poster who is such a coward that he or she prefers the cloak of anonymity rather that the full rays of the sun shining upon her/him as we read the words of utter ignorance that were written. Cowardice and hypocrisy are two of the traits I despise the most. Couple that with the commenter's racism and lack of manners, and, well, that's a recipe for a morning tongue lashing compliments of A.M. in the Morning! Click to read the comments below the Krugman article. Have a wonderful Saturday!

-am

Blog Entries
Avoiding a Slow Painful Death of the American Dream 9.5.07
Are Progressives and Tancredo Singing from Similar Song Sheet? 9.4.07
Note from A.M. in the Morning! on Sun Herald Editorial 9.2.07

News Items

September 7, 2007
Gary Anderson: Listen to and Talk with Mississippi's Next Insurance Commissioner
Hurricanes: It's time to look forward, not back Clarion Ledger Opinion

September 4, 2007
Fiore Animated Cartoon: The Doctor San Francisco Chronicle
Paul Krugman: The New American Way Krugman writes for the New York Times.
WSJ: As Premiums Rise, Homeowners Drop Wind Coverage Wall Street Journal Online

September 3, 2007
St. Bernard sewage reveals waste: FEMA hauls it rather than build new plant Times Picayune

September 2, 2007
A False War Between the States Sun Herald
A War (of words) Between the States Sun Herald Editorial
Church Groups Give Key Aid to Miss. Town Associated Press


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Friday, September 07, 2007

Gary Anderson: Listen to and Talk with Mississippi's Next Insurance Commissioner

by Ana Maria

Listen to Gary on Big WWL 870AM & 105.3FM this Saturday.

Gary will be on Big WWL 870AM & 105.3FM from 11:10am until 11:30am CDT and can be heard throughout South Mississippi or live on the web at www.wwl.com. Find the blue “Listen Live” button.



Call-in and support Gary by dialing 504-260-1870 or 866-889-0870.

Congratulate him on toppling the soon-to-be former Insurance Commissioner George Dale. Find out what it is that sets Gary apart from his current opponent, Republican Mike Chaney, and the important reasons to ensure Gary becomes our next commissioner of insurance.


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Hurricanes: It's time to look forward, not back



A report that "Katrina cottages," designed to take 150-miles-per-hour winds may not be able to withstand such pressure is prompting a second look at the structures - and should prompt more "second looks."

PBS&J Engineering, a Florida-based company hired to help manage the cottage program, is expected to inspect the structures this week, according to the Mississippi Emergency Management Agency.

While the cottages are described as "a fantastic house," the foundations are said to lack some braces to prevent sliding in a strong storm and the Gulf Coast's soil requires a stronger anchoring system.

The questions regarding the "hurricane-proof" structures are apt now, with the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina having just passed. There has been much commentary about what has happened.

For example, there have been unfair comparisons of federal funding to Mississippi versus Louisiana, see clarionledger.com's StoryChat item: http://forum.clarionledger.com/viewtopic.php?t=3502.

But, the first two Atlantic hurricanes this season reached the highest Category 5 level, the first time that's happened since record-keeping began in 1851, and just passed the Coast to go to Mexico.

They should serve as a warning of how prepared Mississippi is for a hurricane.

Ensuring that the Katrina cottages, a two-year alternative housing pilot program, be able to withstand winds of up to 150 mph, the same of a Category 4 hurricane, falls within the "looking forward" category.

So does the announcement this week that the Federal Emergency Management Agency will move hurricane victims who have health concerns about their travel trailers and mobile homes to hotels and motels.

FEMA must have emergency plans ready, including housing, if another disaster occurs.

Congress should also be moving along the lines that 4th District U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Bay St. Louis, has suggested to add wind coverage to the National Flood Insurance Program. At a town meeting at Pass Christian Aug. 13, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., pledged action.

Although Gov. Haley Barbour's Commission on Recovery, Rebuilding and Renewal in its report, After Katrina: Building Back Better Than Ever (www.governorscommission.com), offered a tremendous blueprint in the storm's wake, building affordable housing for middle and low-income residents remains a paramount issue (in large part held up by the insurance quandary).

Hindsight should not obscure quick, prepared, preventive action. We can certainly learn from the past, but it's time to squarely face the future and take action now.

The Clarion Ledger published its opinion on September 7, 2007.


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Avoiding a Slow Painful Death of the American Dream

by Ana Maria

As I think of the American Dream, what comes to mind mostly is owning my own home. For some their home would be a ranch style home on ¼ of an acre. Others want more yard or a big home, in the country or ’burbs or city, in the mountains or at the bottom of ‘em, near a lake, on the river, near an ocean. Talking about owning a home will bring up plenty of topics to discuss from whose the best homebuilder in the area to the best appliances to the school system that kids will attend to carpet samples. None of it particularly sexy, but all of it enveloped in a belief so wedded to our most deeply held beliefs as Americans that we get almost giddy when we hear about someone buying their first home. Owning a home is the quintessential attainment of a very real piece of the American Dream.

Last week’s decision from the Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals allowing insurance companies to make good on the finely printed clause was a horrendous blow to home and business owners whose properties were destroyed when Katrina’s nasty winds blew away at over 135 miles per hour for hours on end. The insurance companies made their argument that their little known clause exempted them from being legally responsible for wind damage if water also came on the property. The federal appeals court bought it, and in so doing helped to hasten a slow painful death of this very central part of the American Dream.

The “gotcha” clause, as I call it, is the “concurrent clause” which essentially states that if a home or business is damaged by wind AND by water, the insurance company doesn’t have to pay a cent for the damage that wind causes. Surely to goodness, insurance companies didn’t emphasize this “gotcha” clause when training its agents. Clearly, emphasizing the “gotcha” clause was not a central part of the routine pitch to clients. After all, how many policies would these esteemed companies have sold if their agents had been directed to state flat out to prospective customers something along the following.

“I want you to understand fully that I will gladly sell you homeowner/ business owner insurance which includes wind damage from a hurricane. Now, this clause right here—see its in tiny letters, yeah this clause basically states that if a drop of water comes on the property, we do not pay you a penny. We’ll pay if the hurricane is only wind AND you can prove that no water touched the property.”
Around here, any one of us from any ethnic or racial background whether we’re young or old, rich or poor, well educated or not would have come back with something like this.
“What are you talking about?! There is no such thing as a hurricane without water. A hurricane without water is called a tornado, fool. What’s this nonsense that if there is damage by both wind and water, you are not going to pay for the damages caused by wind. What kind of idiot do you think I am, coming up in here in my home trying to take my money like that?! You’re the idiot.
Why don’t you go on and get out of here. That’s right. Get out of my house and go find you a real job, a respectable job. Quit this snake oil sales job you got. And don’t let me see you bothering my neighbors or my family. I’ll get after you. I’ll run you off. Now, go on and get out!”
Yeah, we don’t cotton that kind of snake oil sales garbage. You know what? Neither does the rest of the country.

But that is what the insurance industry has been allowed to get away with. They have sold policies throughout the Southeast from Texas to Florida up the east coast telling home and business owners that when it comes to wind damage, they are covered and that as long as they get flood insurance, not to worry. As has been documented in plenty of news stories and in many of my entries, two major problems come with that.

First, flood insurance is not always available to folks. My neighborhood is not in a flood zone. A business owner around the corner asked about flood insurance and was told he couldn’t get it because . . . he is not in a flood zone. Can’t buy what won’t be sold to you.

Secondly—and this is really the big bugaboo, the federal government contracted with the private insurance industry to adjudicate the flood claims to determine the extent of the damage that flooding caused. These same private insurance claims adjusters also determine the extent to which their own private companies, companies that are paying their salaries, are financially responsible for the damages that wind caused. This scenario set up a conflict of interest, the perfect storm through which to transfer wind damage costs to the federal flood insurance program and stiff the customers who didn’t have flood insurance because, well, they weren’t in a flood zone.

This conflict of interest is the basis for the allegation that the private insurance companies defrauded the federal government taxpayers through deliberately attributing its own wind damage costs to water/flood damage. Couple this with the tiny printed “gotcha” clause that lets insurance companies finagle out of paying us the money for which we have faithfully paid our premiums and we are S-O-L on our financial security plan.

Remember, like all policies, flood insurance also has limits. So when the money that should have paid for the wind damages remains in our insurance company’s bank account, we as home and business owners are stuck without the money we thought we would have when a storm hits.

So far, the insurance companies have a “gotcha” card which the federal appeals court validated unfortunately AND they get to determine how much damage to wiggle out of by attributing more damage to water than may have been attributed by someone whose loyalty was to the flood policy alone. Next, we have insurance companies canceling insurance policies throughout the country.

Even after having pawned off their wind damage costs to the federal flood insurance policy, rates are climbing.
"It's horrible. Rates have gone through the ceiling," said Fort Morgan builder Greg Miller.

Miller said he paid $22,000 in coverage on four condo units until Katrina struck two years ago. He now pays $108,000 on his units for less coverage: "That's all we could get," he said.
Miller is in Alabama. Here's a nice headline from that state.

Ala. Coast Pushes for Insurance Relief


Here’s another headline from a state that Katrina didn’t hit.

South Carolina State Insurance director loses insurance

The article reported, "State Director Richardson lost his homeowner’s insurance when the company cancelled the policy."
"I guess it just proves nobody's immune. If I'm not immune, then nobody is," Richardson said.

Not exactly a laughing matter, but does state the obvious. If the rich and powerful are unprotected, neither are those of us who are neither rich nor powerful. Remember even powerful people in positions of great political power like U.S. Senator (R-MS)Trent Lott and Congressman Gene Taylor (D-MS) had to hire a lawyer—Dickie Scruggs—and sue State Farm before receiving a penny on their insurance policies.

That is the very point of Congressman Taylor’s proposal to include wind coverage with the federal flood insurance policy. The insurance companies are not paying on their wind coverage policies, because they have been allowed to insert its “gotcha” clause in our policies. The federal appeals court has validated the industry’s “gotcha” card. The insurance industry may have potentially pawned off on the federal government billions of dollars of wind damage claims. So we are left flapping in the wind of financial ruin when we thought we were being financially prudent in purchasing our home owner's policies-. Plus it's a must when we get a home loan.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals just blew to the winds our ability to have and to hold on to our part of the American Dream.

Part of the American Dream that remains in our hands, though, is telling our elected officials to fix this. In our hands rests the ability to move forward in a new direction that places the financial security of our families and businesses in ONE policy for both wind and water. This is how we ensure that this tremendous tragedy isn’t repeated anywhere else.

Participating in political hell raising is good for the soul and great for making our political dreams a reality. So, let’s get to calling and emailing our congressional representatives to support H.R. 3121, which creates ONE policy for both wind and water. Soon, the full House of Representatives is going to vote on this bill, and our congressional representatives need to know that we support it.

After all, this remains the United States of America. We remain Americans. We dream of a better tomorrow. It's in our blood to dream of making things better. We can actively participate in making those dreams come true. This is how we avoid a slow painful death to what is central to the American Dream. We are a nation of doers. We take action. It's as simple as letting your fingers do the walking. This is our way, the American Way.

Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Are Progressives and Tancredo Singing from Similar Song Sheet?

by Ana Maria

Over the course of the 18 months or so after Katrina, I just couldn’t really understand what was taking so damned long for my family and friends to get it together. Good God already. Deal with the insurance companies. Play rough. Keep calling FEMA. Geeze, Louise!

It’s a hurricane like we’ve been through many times before. Heck, if we can survive Camille, I mean, goodness gracious alive.

Of course, I thought this from the comfort of my very lovely apartment in the heart of Silicon Valley. I thought this as I spoke to my family from my cell phone as I lay in the sun by one of the three sparkling pools in my complex. I reflected on this as I drank a Starbucks frappuccino in the middle of a relaxing 3-mile walk around my neat, orderly, well-maintained community in North San Jose.

Then in March of this year, I arrived in the heart of Katrina Land, ground zero for Katrina itself. My utter ignorance became apparent immediately. I’m days away from the six-month mark being here helping to put back together my elderly mother’s home. I’ve chronicled that journey on my blog A.M. in the Morning! which began as an outlet for my frustrations with the conditions with which my family members and friends here in Mississippi and throughout the New Orleans area must deal. It’s also a way to channel much needed political energy into helping get the resources we need to complete the job we desire AND to prevent our horrors from befalling other American families and businesses.

Friends outside of Katrina Land encouraged me to write what I was experiencing, witnessing, concluding. They told me that the MSM just doesn’t convey these critical pieces of information, and Americans care when we are shown a need. However, the drumming of “Katrina fatigue” beats on. Enter Tancredo.

Last week, Republican Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo grabbed the headlines with his “Enough is enough” declaration regarding federal aid in the Katrina-ravaged region. He is oblivious to or couldn’t care less about the reasons that this American region still suffers tremendously and in many directions and that the federal recovery efforts to date have been insufficient to put us back to our knees.

At the 2nd anniversary commemoration last week, Waveland Mayor Tommy Longo stated succinctly that we don’t want a hand out, just a hand up to get to our knees and that we can get to our feet from there. From New Orleans clear through the Mississippi Gulf Coast and over to Bayou LeBatre Alabama, we’re still not yet to our knees. I guess that’s a great place to be for people like Tancredo who choose to kick us in the teeth. I expect as much from people like Tancredo to turn their backs on their fellow Americans. Tancredo is a compassionless conservative.

In a rather disconcerting way, though, a comment on one of my posts on Daily Kos the other day forced me to look at what has been nagging at me for a while.

And it steams me that, once again, a post about Katrina and the misery the people of the Gulf Coast are enduring right now, sinks to the bottom so quickly.

Ho hum. It's just another post about Katrina. No need to reply. It's so -- Yesterday-- isn't it?
Is this poster accurate? Are progressives singing from a similar song sheet as Tancredo?

An excerpt of the mainstream media’s article on Tancredo received 254 comments. No analysis. No rebuttal. No discussion of real life in today’s Katrina region. No means through which to channel the political outrage that his comment created.

Primarily the entry excerpted Tancredo’s latest stupidity. Bam! Plenty of interaction.

OK it’s a posting from Kos himself, but still, I do believe that there is something missing. An article about yet another Republican bafoon garners hundreds of responses in what appears as a knee-jerk reaction from my side of the fence, at least to me as a progressive who is now deeply inside of Katrina reality. Other posts about real post-Katrina life and positive political action to take to remedy the situation . . . “sinks to the bottom so quickly”.

I just wonder. Katrina embodies every aspect of what is wrong with the Bush Administration and everything that is wonderful about the American people. When disaster hits, we’re generous with our time and money. We are doers and want to solve problems.

Bush leaves it up to the charity of our people to take care of completely heretofore government responsibilities such as emergency response and infrastructure. Bush creates disaster (i.e. Iraq) and is generous with our tax money to fund it and the time and lives of our soldiers who would rather be home with their families and friends. o on and so forth.

Again, I wonder about that one comment on my posting.

As progressives, are we only into the façade of political engagement particularly if its anti-something and we can demonstrate quickly our latest verbal prowess channeling our immense frustration into an arena that will bear no real political fruit from which we can eat nor any real political consequence to the object of our distain?

Maybe I’m just a bit weary. I’ve only been here in the heart of Katrina Land just a hair under six months, and I’m feeling the weight of it. My three brothers have put in gobs more months and time and effort than I have. They jokingly welcome me to the real 'Katrina-fatigued' club.

Everything is simply labor and time intensive. Nerves are frayed. Convenience is a distant memory, and we’re among the lucky throughout the region. This is hard, and I didn't even go through the storm itself or the immediate aftermath of dealing with Dirt, Dead Bodies, and White House Dirt Bags.

I supposed that I’m definitely suffering from a momentary lapse into Katrina-fatigue— that overwhelming sense that this is just never going to end, that our recovery is merely a political punch line to be used by left and right alike without any regard to doing what needs doing.

When it comes to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, though, I do wonder whether we are as guilty as the next of looking only for the attention grabbing headlines through which to channel our great frustration with a thoroughly corrupt administration as well as our lack of political savvy to achieve the goals we desire or the persistence to achieve them over time. An immediate sense of gratification for having shown someone something—even if it is anyone but those that hold the levers of political power.

Today, many of the soldiers in Iraq come from the Katrina-ravaged region: Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama. We care greatly about ending the war, so perhaps we can take care of these soldiers and their families inside the Katrina region while also seeking ways to create the big political momentum needed to end the catastrophe that is Bush’s Iraq.

Personally, I cannot imagine how it must feel for these soldiers who are being sent to work day and night to rebuild a country that Bush destroyed all the while Bush’s insurance buddies are allowed to destroy the financial security of the families of these very same soldiers?!

When we talk of insurance companies deliberately not paying on the WIND policies, we’re also talking about men and women in Iraq whose homes were destroyed here in the Gulf Coast Katrina Region and whose insurance companies are not paying up on the wind-related damages. Perhaps we can contact our elected officials to support the proposal that will help Americans—including soldiers in Iraq—purchase wind and flood coverage in ONE policy and avoid the great rip off that the insurance industry has engaged in.

Clearly the Tancredos of the world are using Katrina as a punch line to grab media attention. Progressives can throw out that song sheet and sing a different tune to help everyone—including our beloved soldiers in Iraq—by helping to spur economic recovery down here through helping every family and business purchase a single and affordable policy for both wind and flood coverage. This will help revive the American Dream for the Katrina region. When it comes to helping our soldiers who live here, this becomes a rather delightfully patriotic act, too. Progressively patriotic.

Now that's a tune worth singing.

Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Fiore Animated Cartoon: The Doctor




Click to play The Doctor comic video regarding healthcare in post-Katrina New Orleans.

Mark Fiore is a San Francisco cartoonist and animator whose work also appears in the Washington Post, L.A. Times, San Francisco Chronicle, and other publications.


___________________________________________

Broadening Katrina’s Lens: A Five-Part Series
Part 1: Broadening Katrina's Lens
Part 2: Recovery’s Two Major Impediments: $$$ and the "F" word
Part 3: The "F" Word: FEMA
Part 4: Katrina’s Bigger Picture
Part 5: Katrina’s Karmic Payback: Insurance Reform
___________________________________________


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......

Paul Krugman: The New American Way

PAUL KRUGMAN

Two years ago, Americans watched in horror as a great city drowned, and wondered what had happened to their country. Where was FEMA? Where was the National Guard? Why wasn't the government of the world's richest, most powerful nation coming to the aid of its citizens?

What we mostly saw on TV was the nightmarish scene at the Superdome, but things were even worse at the New Orleans convention center, where thousands were stranded without food or water. The levees were breached Monday morning — but as late as Thursday evening, The Washington Post reported, the convention center "still had no visible government presence," while "corpses lay out in the open among wailing babies and other refugees."

Meanwhile, federal officials were oblivious.

"We are extremely pleased with the response that every element of the federal government, all of our federal partners, have made to this terrible tragedy," declared Michael Chertoff, the secretary for Homeland Security, on Wednesday. When asked the next day about the situation at the convention center, he dismissed the reports as "a rumor."

Today, much of the Gulf Coast remains in ruins. Less than half the federal money set aside for rebuilding — as opposed to emergency relief — has actually been spent, in part because the Bush administration refused to waive the requirement that local governments put up matching funds for recovery projects: An impossible burden for communities whose tax bases have literally been washed away.

On the other hand, generous investment tax breaks, supposedly designed to spur recovery in the disaster area, have been used to build luxury condominiums near the University of Alabama's football stadium in Tuscaloosa, 200 miles inland.

But why should we be surprised by any of this? The Bush administration's response to Hurricane Katrina — the mixture of neglect of those in need, obliviousness to their plight, and self-congratulation in the face of abject failure — has become standard operating procedure. These days, it's Katrina all the time.

Consider the White House reaction to new Census data on income, poverty and health insurance. By any normal standard, this week's report was a devastating indictment of the administration's policies. After all, last year the administration insisted that the economy was booming — and whined that it wasn't getting enough credit. What the data show, however, is that 2006, while a good year for the wealthy, brought only a slight decline in the poverty rate and a modest rise in median income, with most Americans still considerably worse off than they were before President Bush took office.

Most disturbing of all, the number of Americans without health insurance jumped. At this point, there are 47 million uninsured people in this country, 8.5 million more than there were in 2000. Bush may think that being uninsured is no big deal — "you just go to an emergency room" — but the reality is that if you're uninsured every illness is a catastrophe.

Yet the White House news release on the report declared that President Bush was "pleased" with the new numbers: Heckuva job, economy!

Bush's only concession that something might be amiss was to say that "challenges remain in reducing the number of uninsured Americans" — a statement reminiscent of Emperor Hirohito's famous admission, in his surrender broadcast, that "the war situation has developed not necessarily to Japan's advantage."

There's a powerful political faction in this country that's determined to draw exactly the wrong lesson from the Katrina debacle — namely, that the government always fails when it attempts to help people in need, so it shouldn't even try.

"I don't want the people who ran the Katrina cleanup to manage our health care system," says Mitt Romney, as if the Bush administration's practice of appointing incompetent cronies to key positions and refusing to hold them accountable no matter how badly they perform — did I mention that Chertoff still has his job? — were the way government always works.

Future historians will, without doubt, see Katrina as a turning point. The question is whether it will be seen as the moment when America remembered the importance of good government, or the moment when neglect and obliviousness to the needs of others became the new American way.

Paul Krugman writes for The New York Times.

Original published September 4, 2007 by Monterey Herald.

___________________________________________

Broadening Katrina’s Lens: A Five-Part Series
Part 1: Broadening Katrina's Lens
Part 2: Recovery’s Two Major Impediments: $$$ and the "F" word
Part 3: The "F" Word: FEMA
Part 4: Katrina’s Bigger Picture
Part 5: Katrina’s Karmic Payback: Insurance Reform
___________________________________________


Return to A.M. in the Morning! Home

Read More......